Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Gold and Gray |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is a bit better than the Galaxy S8 Active's 81.9 general score. Even though the Galaxy F62 is a little bit heavier than the Galaxy S8 Active, it's just a little thinner and way newer. The Galaxy S8 Active's CPU is very similar to Galaxy F62's processing unit, because although the Galaxy S8 Active has 2 GB less RAM, it also counts with more CPU cores.
Galaxy S8 Active has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px. Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing photos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a way bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with a much better 64 megapixels resolution.
Galaxy F62 features a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a way better battery performance than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.