Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 is a bit better than the Galaxy S9, with a global score of 88.1 against 83.3. The Samsung Galaxy F62 construction is incredibly newer, but a lot heavier and thicker than the Galaxy S9. The Galaxy S9 counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy F62, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 2960px resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 has just a bit better performance than Galaxy F62, because although it has lesser RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores. Samsung Galaxy F62 has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light photos and worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a much larger camera sensor and a much better resolution camera.
Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S9, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.