Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | -- |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.99 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having a overall score of 88.1 against 80.1. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS, but the Galaxy F62 has the previous 11 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Galaxy F62 is a newer phone, and it's also thinner and lighter than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy F62, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with more processing cores (although slower). The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit better screen than Galaxy F62, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher quantity of pixels per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy F62 counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a way better (4K) video quality, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera with a way higher 64 megapixels resolution.
Galaxy F62 counts with a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.