Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 global score. Both phones in this comparison review work with the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding OS features. The Galaxy F62 construction is newer, a bit thinner and a little bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro.
Galaxy F62 features just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a bit inferior pixels number per display inch, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Galaxy XCover Pro's processing unit is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy F62 one, because although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1 TB. The Galaxy F62 has a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4050mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs and videos in low light situations, it also counts with a lot higher resolution camera, a way better (4K) video quality and a way larger camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.