Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy F62, with an 88.5 score against 88.1. Galaxy Z Flip is an older phone than the Samsung Galaxy F62, but Samsung managed to make it way thinner and somewhat lighter. Both devices in our current comparison include Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version while Samsung Galaxy F62 has Android 11, so it counts with a lot of extra features.
Galaxy F62 counts with a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit worse pixels density, they both have a same size screen. Galaxy F62 counts with a quite bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has a larger number of cores and 2 GB more RAM. Galaxy F62 takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much higher 64 MP resolution back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 112% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.