Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy F62's global score of 88.1. Both phones in our current comparison come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding OS features. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G body is thinner and lighter than Samsung Galaxy F62, even when they were released only a couple months apart.
The Galaxy F62 has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a little lower pixels quantity per inch of display, they both have a display with the same size. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has a greater number of cores and more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy F62 captures better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a way bigger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy F62 has a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.