Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a little bit better than the Galaxy F62, having a 94.6 score against 88.1. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Galaxy F62 were released only a couple of months apart, Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is noticeably thinner but a lot heavier than Galaxy F62. Both phones in this comparison include the same Android 11 operating system.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy F62, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a higher number of cores (and also faster). The Galaxy F62 counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better screen density.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features a greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Galaxy F62 has a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy F62 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.