Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 11.99 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a general score of 90.6, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy F62's 88.1 overall score. These phones include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). Although Galaxy Z Fold 3 and the Samsung Galaxy F62 were only released 6 months apart, Galaxy Z Fold 3's construction is extremely thinner but heavier than the Samsung Galaxy F62.
The Galaxy F62 has a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better screen density. The Galaxy F62 counts with a quite bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has a greater amount of RAM and 4 more processing cores. The Galaxy F62 counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a camera with much more mega-pixels and a larger aperture to take better images and video in low-light environments.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 59% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.