Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2021-04-14 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.18 x 2.68 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black, Green and Pink |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 449 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xperia 5 III is a little bit better than Galaxy F62, having a global score of 90.5 against 88.1. The Xperia 5 III is a thinner and lighter phone than Galaxy F62, even though they were released with only 2 months difference. These phones include the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should give you very similar OS features.
Sony Xperia 5 III has a display that's very similar to Galaxy F62's display, because although the Sony Xperia 5 III has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2520 resolution and a little greater pixel count in each inch of display. Sony Xperia 5 III has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and 4 more processing cores.
Samsung Galaxy F62 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Sony Xperia 5 III, because although it has a tinier aperture and worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a same size back camera sensor, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a back camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Xperia 5 III counts with a way bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB, the Xperia 5 III also has 128 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy F62 features a superior battery duration than Sony Xperia 5 III, because it has a 56 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.