Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black, Pink, Red and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 801 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 10.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a global score of 88.1, which is better than Xperia XZ Premium's 79.8 general score. Samsung Galaxy F62's construction is way newer, but somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than the Xperia XZ Premium. Sony Xperia XZ Premium has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with 4 more cpu cores.
Xperia XZ Premium features a way better screen than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with way more brightness, a way higher screen pixel density and a lot better 2160 x 3840 resolution. The Galaxy F62 counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Xperia XZ Premium, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that admits up to 1 TB.
Galaxy F62 counts with a way better battery lifetime than Xperia XZ Premium, because it has a 117 percent larger battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy F62 captures much clearer photos and videos than Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a much better resolution camera, a much larger sensor and a bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.