Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-02-22 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is better than the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, with a global score of 88.1 against 79. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy F62 has the previous 11 version and Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Samsung Galaxy F62 body is noticeably newer and thinner than the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact's, but it's also a lot heavier.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact features a bit better performance than Galaxy F62, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with 4 more cpu cores. The Xperia XZ2 Compact features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy F62, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 and a lot smaller display, it also counts with way more brightness and a little bit greater amount of pixels in each display inch.
The Galaxy F62 features much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that admits up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy F62 has a way better battery duration than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 shoots much clearer videos and photos than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a way more mega pixels camera in the back, a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger camera aperture for better low light photography and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.