Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black, Blue and Silver |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.99 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is better than Sony Xperia XZs, having an 88.1 score against 77.2. The Samsung Galaxy F62 is a newer device than Sony Xperia XZs, although it is thicker and noticeably heavier. The Samsung Galaxy F62 has just a little better hardware performance than Xperia XZs, and although they both have 4 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has more RAM.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a little sharper screen than Xperia XZs, because although it has a bit lower display density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400. Galaxy F62 has a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Xperia XZs, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB.
Xperia XZs takes clearer videos and photos than Galaxy F62, although it has a back facing camera with a lot worse resolution, a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light captures and videos, a way smaller camera sensor capturing way lower quality images and a worse video resolution. The Galaxy F62 features a much longer battery lifetime than Xperia XZs, because it has a 141 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.