Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2015-09-02 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.43 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 409.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 430 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (60 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 2900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 520 hours standby time 13.2 hours talk time |
| 8.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is much better than the Xperia Z5, with a general score of 88.1 against 77.6. The Samsung Galaxy F62 construction is a lot newer, but way heavier and a lot thicker than Xperia Z5. These phones include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy F62 has a newer 11 version and Xperia Z5 has Android 5.1.
The Xperia Z5 has a bit better CPU than Galaxy F62, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with more CPU cores (but slower) and a graphics co-processor. Xperia Z5 features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a bit lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bit better screen pixel density.
Galaxy F62 features a better camera than Sony Xperia Z5, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy F62 also has a back-facing camera with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Galaxy F62 has a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Xperia Z5, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a much better battery duration than Xperia Z5, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.