Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| -- | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a global score of 88.1, which is much better than TCL 20 Pro 5G's 76.1 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy F62 is a better device than the TCL 20 Pro 5G, we must tell that it is also a little thicker and heavier. These phones include the same Android 11 operating system. Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a bit better hardware performance than TCL 20 Pro 5G, although it has lesser cpu cores , they both have 6 GB of RAM.
Galaxy F62 has a little more vivid screen than TCL 20 Pro 5G. Both of them have a display with the same size, the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and the same count of pixels in each inch of screen. Galaxy F62 features a little bit better camera than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same video resolution and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy F62 also has a back-facing camera with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution and a bigger camera sensor.
TCL 20 Pro 5G has much more memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has 256 GB internal memory. The Galaxy F62 features a really longer battery duration than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because it has a 56 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.