Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 12 |
| 2021-02-22 | -- |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | -- |
| 7.69 ounces | -- |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 524 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 6.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is a bit better than the Xiaomi 12S Ultra, getting a general score of 88.1 against 81. Both devices in this comparison include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy F62 has an older 11 version and Xiaomi 12S Ultra has Android 12. Galaxy F62 has a much more powerful processor than Xiaomi 12S Ultra, although it has an inferior number of cores and a lower amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi 12S Ultra features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have a same size display, the Xiaomi 12S Ultra also has a better pixels density, a really brighter screen and a higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution. Galaxy F62 counts with more storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi 12S Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features a way better battery lifetime than Xiaomi 12S Ultra, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity. The Xiaomi 12S Ultra has a slightly better camera than Galaxy F62, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting images or video in poorly lited situations, a smaller camera sensor taking worse quality photos and a camera in the back with a lot lower resolution, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.