Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2021-02-22 | 2018-04-20 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.36 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Black Shark, having a overall score of 88.1 against 80.4. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy F62 has 11 version and Xiaomi Black Shark has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Samsung Galaxy F62 body is a lot newer, but somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker than the Xiaomi Black Shark.
The Xiaomi Black Shark counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy F62, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels, it also counts with a little bit better screen pixel density and a brighter display. The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Black Shark has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy F62, because it has more RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores. The Galaxy F62 features a superior battery duration than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. Galaxy F62 takes a lot better photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy F62 also has a way bigger sensor shooting way higher quality photographs and videos and a back facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.