Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Black Shark 3's 86.6 general score. The Samsung Galaxy F62 is a newer cellphone, and it's also a little thinner and a bit lighter than Xiaomi Black Shark 3. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy F62 has the newer 11 version and Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has Android 10 version.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a little sharper display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3. Both have the same pixels density, the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a same size screen. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 captures a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the same camera aperture, a same size camera sensor and a 64 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has higher video frame rate.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy F62 features a superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has a 48 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.