Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Blasting black |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has an overall score of 90.1, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy F62's overall score of 88.1. Even though Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is a better cellphone than Samsung Galaxy F62, we must note that it's also older, a little thicker and a little heavier. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has the older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy F62 has Android 11.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has a higher number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a bit better looking display than Galaxy F62, because it has a better 1440 x 3120 resolution, a bit larger screen and a bit greater count of pixels per screen inch.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro takes a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy F62, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same (4K) video quality, a same resolution back-facing camera and a 0.59 inches camera sensor, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Galaxy F62 counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because it has a 40 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.