Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 93.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-04-21 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Alpine white and Solstice grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 13.86 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy F62, getting a 93.1 score against 88.1. Even though the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro is older than Samsung Galaxy F62, it's design is a little thinner and just a little lighter. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy F62, because although it has a just a little lower screen pixels density and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, and they both have a display with the same size, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro also counts with way more screen brightness.
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro counts with a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy F62 has more storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a lot bigger camera sensor which provides a way higher image and video quality, a back camera with lot more megapixels and a larger aperture to take better images in poorly lited environments.
The Galaxy F62 has a way better battery life than Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro, because it has a 56% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.