Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-10-01 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.62 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Cosmic black and Lunar silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 650 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 11.99 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi 10T's global score of 87.9. These devices include Android OS, but the Galaxy F62 has the newer 11 version while Xiaomi Mi 10T has Android 10 version. The Galaxy F62 is a a bit heavier phone than the Xiaomi Mi 10T, but both are 0.37inches thick.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T has a little bit better display than Galaxy F62, and although they both have a better amount of pixels per inch of screen, a display of the same size and an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 10T also has much more brightness. The Galaxy F62 has a much better storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 10T, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy F62 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Xiaomi Mi 10T features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Xiaomi Mi 10T also has a greater number of faster cores. The Galaxy F62 has a much better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 10T, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Xiaomi Mi 10T counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy F62, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low-light photos and videos, and they both have a same size back camera sensor and a 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera, the Xiaomi Mi 10T also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.