Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 90 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-10-01 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Aurora blue, Cosmic black and Lunar silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 650 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 11.99 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has a global score of 90, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy F62's 88.1 global score. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has the same weight and thickness than the Galaxy F62. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has an older 10 version while Galaxy F62 has Android 11 version.
Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same count of pixels in each screen inch, a display with the same size and the same exact 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro also has a lot brighter screen. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro features a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and more cpu cores.
Galaxy F62 counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy F62 also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy F62 features a way better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, because it has a 40 percent more battery capacity.
Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro takes much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video definition, a camera with way more mega pixels, a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.