Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2021-03-29 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 8.25 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Ceramic Black and Ceramic White |
| -- | Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 1700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 8.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has an overall score of 90.7, which is just a bit better than Galaxy F62's global score of 88.1. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra's construction is thinner but just a bit heavier than Galaxy F62, and both were only released with a couple months difference. Both of these phones work with the same Android 11 operating system, so both of them should provide you all the same OS features.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a higher number of cores. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy F62, because it has way more brightness, a greater screen density, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a bit larger display.
The Galaxy F62 has a greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a back-facing camera with much less mega pixels, a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs in low light environments and a tinier sensor capturing lower quality videos and photographs, it also counts with a lot better video quality.
Galaxy F62 has a really longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.