Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 76.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2017-04-28 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.72 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2457 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | -- |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3350mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is much better than Xiaomi Mi 6's score of 76.5. The Galaxy F62 design is extremely newer, but notably thicker and notably heavier than Xiaomi Mi 6. The Xiaomi Mi 6 has a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have 6 GB of RAM memory, the Xiaomi Mi 6 also has a greater number of cores.
The Xiaomi Mi 6 has just a bit better display than Galaxy F62, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a little better display pixels density and a brighter screen. Galaxy F62 has a very superior memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 6, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy F62 also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy F62 features a way better camera than Xiaomi Mi 6, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy F62 also has a much bigger back camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a much more mega pixels camera.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a much longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 6, because it has a 7000mAh battery size against 3350mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.