Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 83.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2019-03-06 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.20 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.10 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black, Blue and Purple |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 9's global score of 83.2. Galaxy F62 is a newer device than the Xiaomi Mi 9, although it's a lot heavier and somewhat thicker. Xiaomi Mi 9 features a bit better display than Galaxy F62, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a brighter display and a bit more pixels per inch of screen.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 has a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have a 6 GB RAM memory, the Xiaomi Mi 9 also has 4 more CPU cores. The Samsung Galaxy F62 has much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 9, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Xiaomi Mi 9 counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy F62, although it has a back facing camera with a much worse 48 megapixels resolution, a worse (4K) video resolution and a tinier back-facing camera sensor which offers a lower photo and video quality, they both have a same size aperture.
Galaxy F62 counts with a superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.