Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-02-22 | 2019-04-15 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, getting an 88.1 score against 81.4. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy F62 has 11 version and Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy F62's construction is newer than the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE's, but it is notably heavier and a lot thicker.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE features a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy F62, and although they both have 6 GB of RAM memory, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also has a larger number of cores. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a little better pixel number in each inch in the display and more brightness.
Galaxy F62 shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have the same video definition, the same video frame rates and a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy F62 also has a lot better 64 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a bigger camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Galaxy F62 features a much better storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy F62 also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a way better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.