Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-02-22 | 2019-06-17 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| -- | Metal and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi 9T, having an 88.1 score against 82.2. Samsung Galaxy F62's construction is newer, but just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier than the Xiaomi Mi 9T. Both devices in this comparison review use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy F62 has the newer 11 version while Xiaomi Mi 9T has Android 10 version.
Xiaomi Mi 9T's processing unit is very similar to the Galaxy F62 one, and although the Xiaomi Mi 9T has 4 more CPU cores , they both have a 6 GB RAM memory. The Galaxy F62 and the Xiaomi Mi 9T count with quite similar screens, because although the Xiaomi Mi 9T has a little smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen and a little bit more brightness.
Galaxy F62 features a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Galaxy F62 also has a much better resolution back camera and a bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy F62 features a superior memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy F62 also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Galaxy F62 has a way better battery life than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has a 75% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.