Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-02-22 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has a general score of 88.1, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's 82.7 score. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy F62 has 11 version and Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has Android 10 version. Galaxy F62's design is newer, but just a little thicker and heavier than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a display that's very similar to the screen in Galaxy F62, because although the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a little smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen and a little bit brighter screen. Galaxy F62 counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy F62 also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1 TB.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have 6 GB of RAM, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a greater number of faster cores. Samsung Galaxy F62 features a very superior battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro and Galaxy F62 feature similar cameras, and although the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a back camera with a much worse 48 megapixels resolution, a lower video quality and a tinier back-facing camera sensor which offers a worse image and video quality, they both have the same aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.