Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.44 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 295.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 7.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is better than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2, having a score of 88.1 against 77.5. Samsung Galaxy F62's body is way newer than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2's, although it is somewhat thicker and just a little bit heavier. The Galaxy F62 has a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because it has a little bit greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display, a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little bit bigger display. The Galaxy F62 features a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy F62 also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has improved battery life than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because it has a 7000mAh battery size against 5300mAh. Samsung Galaxy F62 shoots much better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution, a way bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a larger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.