Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a general score of 88.1, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's score of 83.8. Samsung Galaxy F62's construction is noticeably newer, but thicker and heavier than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has 2 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores.
Galaxy F62 counts with a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a little bit inferior pixels amount in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a quite larger screen. Samsung Galaxy F62 features a greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy F62 takes a lot better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a much bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality and a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a way better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity against 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.