Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2018-11-01 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black, Blue and Green |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a general score of 88.1, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3's global score of 83.8. The Samsung Galaxy F62 construction weights the same than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, but it is somewhat thicker. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy F62, because it has a higher number of cores and 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with just a bit better display than Galaxy F62, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a brighter display and a little better display density. Galaxy F62 takes better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a back camera with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Galaxy F62 features a really longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.