Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2021-08-10 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Ceramic Black, Ceramic White and Shadow Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (480 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 has a general score of 89, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy F62's overall score of 88.1. Although the Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 and Samsung Galaxy F62 were released only a couple months apart, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 body is somewhat thinner but a bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy F62. Both phones in this comparison come with the same Android 11 OS.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 features a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and a higher number of cores. The Galaxy F62 features a little sharper display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4. Both have a screen of the same size, the same 1080 x 2400px resolution and a better number of pixels per inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy F62 has a much better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, because it has a 7000mAh battery size.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for taking photographs and video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a way more mega pixels camera in the back and a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.