Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2024-07-19 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a general score of 88.1, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4's 84.3 overall score. These phones work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy F62 has the older 11 version while Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has Android 14. Samsung Galaxy F62's design is just a bit lighter than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it is way thicker and was released 3 years before.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a better looking screen than Galaxy F62, because it has way more brightness, a larger screen, a little bit better display pixel density and a way better 2224 x 2488 resolution. Galaxy F62 features a very superior processor than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM.
Galaxy F62 counts with more memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a superior battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because it has a 7000mAh battery size.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a back camera with much less MP, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality pictures and videos, a larger diafragm aperture and a lot better 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.