Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's 87.9 overall score. Both devices we compare here work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy F62 has 11 version while Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has Android 10 version, providing you a lot of extra features. The Samsung Galaxy F62 construction is newer and a little lighter, but also just a little thicker than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same screen density, a same size screen and the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a way brighter screen. The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a higher number of cores. Samsung Galaxy F62 features a way better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a 49% larger battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have a same size sensor and a same resolution back-facing camera, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.