Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.99 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is much better than Xiaomi Poco M3's score of 78.2. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy F62 has a more recent 11 version while Xiaomi Poco M3 has Android 10, so it provides you a couple nice extra features. The Samsung Galaxy F62 design is a little bit heavier but just a little bit thinner than Xiaomi Poco M3, and they were released only 3 months apart.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a little lower pixels amount per display inch, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco M3, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a bit better performance than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with 2 GB more RAM. The Galaxy F62 shoots better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy F62 also has a way higher video resolution, a bigger camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with greater battery lifetime than Xiaomi Poco M3, because it has a 7000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.