Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2021-05-20 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Cool Blue, POCO Yellow and Power Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is a bit better than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G's global score of 80.8. Both phones in our current comparison work with the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that. Galaxy F62 is better than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G, we must note that it's also a little thicker and heavier.
Galaxy F62 features a little better performance than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G, because although it has less cpu cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy F62 has a little more vivid display than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G, because although it has a bit lower display pixel density, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a bit bigger screen.
The Galaxy F62 has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G, because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy F62 features a much better battery lifetime than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a much better camera than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a camera in the back with way more megapixels, a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality photos and videos and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.