Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2021-11-11 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.44 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Cool Blue, POCO Yellow and Power Black |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 810 5G MT6833 (6 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.99 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is slightly better than the Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro 5G, having a score of 88.1 against 81.5. Even being the best phone we compare here, Galaxy F62 is an a bit thicker and somewhat heavier phone than Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro 5G. Both phones we are comparing work with the same Android 11 OS. The Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro 5G counts with a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with 4 more processing cores (although slower).
The Galaxy F62 features a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro 5G, because although it has a just a little inferior pixel count per display inch, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a bit bigger display. Samsung Galaxy F62 captures better photos and videos than Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a camera in the back with way more MP and a way better (4K) video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a greater memory for games and applications than Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro 5G, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1 TB, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy F62 features a much longer battery life than Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro 5G, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.