Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is slightly better than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, having a overall score of 88.1 against 81.6. The Galaxy F62 is a a little bit heavier phone than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, but both of them are equally thin. These devices include Android OS, but Galaxy F62 has a newer 11 version while Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has Android 10 version, providing you lots of additional features and a performance increase.
The Galaxy F62 and the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC count with really similar screens, and although the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a little brighter screen, they both have a screen with the same size, a better pixels amount per inch of screen and an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a bit superior processor than Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a larger number of cores.
The Galaxy F62 has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external memory card slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC captures slightly better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy F62, although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing photos or video in low-light situations, they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a 64 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a same size sensor.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features a much longer battery life than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because it has a 7000mAh battery size instead of 5160mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.