Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2021-03-20 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Frost blue, Metal bronze and Phantom black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a general score of 88.1, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro's 83.4 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy F62 body has the same thickness than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, but it's just a little heavier. Both phones in this comparison review work with the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding operating system features.
The Galaxy F62 has a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro. Both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the same pixel density and a screen with the same size. Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro features as much memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos as Galaxy F62, both of them have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has just a bit better performance than Galaxy F62, and although they both have a 6 GB RAM memory, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also has more processing cores. Samsung Galaxy F62 captures much clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a much more mega pixels back facing camera and a larger sensor which gives a better image and video quality.
The Galaxy F62 has a superior battery life than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 5160mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.