Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.99 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is better than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T's score of 78.2. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy F62 has the newer 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10. Samsung Galaxy F62's design is just a little heavier but just a bit thinner than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and they were released with only a couple months difference.
Galaxy F62 counts with a little better performance than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with 2 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy F62 features a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a just a bit lower pixels amount per inch of screen, it also counts with a little bit larger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy F62 takes much better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a camera with much more mega-pixels, a lot better video quality and a bigger sensor which gives a higher image and video quality. The Galaxy F62 features a much greater storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with improved battery life than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because it has a 17% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.