Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| -- | Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, with an 88.1 score against 82.4. Both phones we are comparing here include the same Android 11 OS (operating system). Despite being the best in this comparison review, we must highlight that it's also a thicker and heavier cellphone.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with just a little better performance than Galaxy F62, and although they both have a 6 GB RAM, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a higher number of cores (but slower). The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy F62, and although they both have a higher pixels number in each inch in the screen, exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a display with the same size, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a much brighter display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro captures just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy F62, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Galaxy F62 counts with a much greater memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy F62 has a way better battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because it has a 39 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.