Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-02-22 | -- |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, with a overall score of 88.1 against 86.1. Both devices in this review come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system). Galaxy F62's body is a little heavier and somewhat thicker than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have a same size screen, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has a higher resolution of 2080 x 2400 and a just a little better display pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have 6 GB of RAM, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has more processing cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro takes a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy F62, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking photos or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a camera with a way better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a really longer battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because it has a 36 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.