Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2021-02-22 | 2018-11-23 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.42 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.99 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has a global score of 88.1, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro's 77.2 overall score. Galaxy F62's construction is newer, but somewhat thicker and heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy F62 has the previous 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has Android 8.1 Oreo.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, although it has 4 less processing cores (but faster), they both have the same RAM memory amount. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels, it also counts with a quite brighter display and a quite higher display density.
Samsung Galaxy F62 shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a camera with a way higher resolution, a way larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way better image and video quality and a bigger aperture to capture better photos and videos in low light environments.
The Galaxy F62 has a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a superior battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.