Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2019-01-15 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.99 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has a general score of 88.1, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7's general score of 80.3. Even though the Galaxy F62 is way newer than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, it is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy F62 has a little bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although it has a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a bigger sensor, a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Galaxy F62 features a bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy F62 also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy F62 has a really longer battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because it has a 7000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.