Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's global score of 76.6. Even though the Galaxy F62 is newer than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, it is just a little heavier and just a little bit thicker. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy F62 has a more recent 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10 version.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a little sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a little lower screen density, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a way bigger memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1 TB and 64 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy F62 features just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has 4 less processing cores , it also counts with more RAM memory. Galaxy F62 features a superior battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity instead of 5020mAh.
Samsung Galaxy F62 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a much better (4K) video quality and a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.