Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's 81.1 general score. These phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy F62 has the newer 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10 version, giving you a couple nice extra features. Although Samsung Galaxy F62 is newer than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, it's just a bit thicker and a little heavier.
Galaxy F62 features just a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. They have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the same pixel density and a same size display. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have 6 GB of RAM memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a larger number of cores (although slower).
The Galaxy F62 counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy F62 has a superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 5020mAh.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit better camera than Galaxy F62, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, they both have the same video frame rate, the same video quality, the same sensor size and a 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.