Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, having an 88.1 score against 79. Galaxy F62's body is newer, but just a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. These phones include the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that. Samsung Galaxy F62 features a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. Both have a display with the same size, the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and the same number of pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy F62 features a superior storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB and more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S and Galaxy F62 feature similar processing units, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with more cpu cores.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a really longer battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity instead of 5020mAh. The Galaxy F62 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same video definition, the same video frame rates and the same aperture, the Galaxy F62 also has a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way better resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.