Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T's global score of 83. These phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy F62 has the newer 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has Android 10, counting with a couple nice extra features and performance optimizations. Galaxy F62's design is just a bit heavier and a little thicker than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with just a little better processing power than Galaxy F62, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores. The Galaxy F62 counts with a slightly better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has a quite worse pixels number in each display inch, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Galaxy F62 has a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy F62 captures a bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same aperture and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy F62 also has a bigger sensor taking better quality videos and pictures and a much higher 64 megapixels resolution camera.
Galaxy F62 has a much longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because it has a 7000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.