Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-02-22 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.99 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is a little bit better than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, having a general score of 88.1 against 80.2. Samsung Galaxy F62's construction is newer than ZTE Axon 10 Pro's, although it's heavier and thicker. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy F62 has a more recent 11 version while ZTE Axon 10 Pro has Android 10, counting with a couple nice extra features.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a bit better performance than Galaxy F62, because it has more RAM and more cores. Samsung Galaxy F62 has just a bit better screen than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a quite bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a slightly better camera than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has worse video frame rate and a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity. Galaxy F62 counts with a superior battery lifetime than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has a 75 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.