Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Fit
GT-S5670B| Global Score | |
| 45.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 2.3.4, 2.2 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-20 |
| 4.34 x 2.41 x 0.50 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 3.82 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 345.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 121 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 5.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7227 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM11 (Single-Core 600 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| -- | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 200 (128 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.84 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 163,84 MB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 2.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.72 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1350mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 642 hours standby time 10.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.12 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has an overall score of 82.9, which is much better than Galaxy Fit's global score of 45.9. The Google Pixel 4a is a heavier but notably thinner phone than Galaxy Fit. Both phones in this review use Android operating system, but Google Pixel 4a has the older 11 version while Galaxy Fit has Android 2.3.4.
Google Pixel 4a features an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Fit, because it has a much larger screen, a much better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a much better pixels quantity per inch in the display. The Google Pixel 4a counts with a lot better hardware performance than Galaxy Fit, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and also faster).
The Google Pixel 4a features a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Fit, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 4a has a way better camera than Galaxy Fit, because it has a back camera with lot more megapixels and a lot higher (4K) video definition.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with a superior battery life than Galaxy Fit, because it has 3140mAh of battery capacity against 1350mAh.
The Google Pixel 4a costs a bit more than Galaxy Fit, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.