Global Score | |
45.9 | 93.6 |
Basic Information | |
Samsung | Samsung |
Android 2.3.4, 2.2 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
-- | 2019-05-16 |
4.34 x 2.41 x 0.50 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
3.82 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
-- | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
-- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
-- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
$ 345.00 | $ 342.00 |
Display / Screen | |
3.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
121 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
5.9 | 8.7 |
Performance | |
Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7227 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
ARM11 (Single-Core 600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
-- | 8 GB RAM |
Adreno 200 (128 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
6.84 | 9.63 |
Storage | |
163,84 MB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
2.02 | 13.3 |
Camera | |
5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
-- | f/1.50 aperture |
-- | 26.00mm focal length |
-- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
-- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
5.72 | 10.23 |
Networks | |
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
-- | Mobile Hotspot |
HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
SIM | Nano SIM |
3.3 | 10.7 |
Battery Life | |
1350mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
-- | Wireless Charging |
642 hours standby time 10.5 hours talk time | -- |
3.12 | 6.32 |
Other Features | |
Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
GPS | GPS |
-- | NFC |
-- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
-- | FM Radio |
The Galaxy S10 5G is much better than Galaxy Fit, with a score of 93.6 against 45.9. Both phones in this review come with Android operating system, but Galaxy S10 5G has older 11 version while Galaxy Fit has Android 2.3.4. The Galaxy S10 5G is a thinner but incredibly heavier cellphone than Galaxy Fit.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Fit, because it has a really bigger display, much more pixels per inch of display and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3040. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a much bigger memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Fit, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a really superior hardware performance than Galaxy Fit, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and also faster). Samsung Galaxy S10 5G captures greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Fit, because it has a way higher 12 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Fit, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Galaxy S10 5G is also cheaper than the Galaxy Fit, making it a simple decision.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.